Illinois and Chicago Sue Trump Over National Guard Deployment: Unconstitutional or Necessary? (2025)

Imagine waking up to the sound of military boots on your streets, not because of an external threat, but because your city’s leadership has fallen out of favor with the president. This is the chilling reality Illinois and Chicago are fighting against as they sue to block the Trump administration’s deployment of the National Guard. But here’s where it gets controversial: Is this a necessary measure to restore order, or an overreach of federal power that undermines local autonomy? Let’s dive in.

In a bold legal move, the state of Illinois and the city of Chicago have filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration, challenging its plans to federalize and deploy National Guard troops. The lawsuit, which can be accessed here (https://www.scribd.com/document/928899121/Illinois-National-Guard-lawsuit), argues that such actions are not only unlawful but also pose a direct threat to civil liberties and local governance. Illinois Attorney General Kwame Raoul pulls no punches, stating, 'Defendants' deployment of federalized troops to Illinois is patently unlawful.' He further emphasizes that this move could exacerbate 'additional unrest,' deepen 'mistrust of police,' and harm the state’s economy. Raoul is seeking a temporary restraining order to halt what he calls an 'illegal, dangerous, and unconstitutional' action.

The controversy stems from a federal memo obtained by CBS News (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/news/300-illinois-national-guard-troops-federal-service/), revealing plans to federalize up to 300 members of the Illinois National Guard. These troops would be deployed to 'protect federal property' and 'government personnel performing federal functions.' Illinois Governor JB Pritzker confirmed the memo and added that an additional 400 National Guard members from Texas would be sent to Chicago and Portland, Oregon. However, a federal judge temporarily blocked the deployment to Portland on Sunday (https://www.cbsnews.com/news/oregon-judge-temporarily-blocks-deployment-national-guard-portland/), raising questions about the legality and necessity of such actions.

And this is the part most people miss: The Trump administration has painted Democrat-led cities like Chicago and Portland as lawless and war-torn, justifying military intervention as part of its crackdown on illegal immigration. Local officials vehemently dispute this characterization, arguing that federal involvement is not only unneeded but is actually inflaming tensions. The lawsuit accuses President Trump of waging a 'long-declared 'War' on Chicago and Illinois,' labeling these actions as both unlawful and dangerous.

At the heart of this dispute is a fundamental question: Should the federal government have the authority to deploy military forces within U.S. cities simply because it disagrees with local leadership? The lawsuit’s introduction powerfully states, 'The American people, regardless of where they reside, should not live under the threat of occupation by the United States military, particularly not simply because their city or state leadership has fallen out of a president's favor.' This sentiment resonates deeply in an era where the balance between federal and local power is increasingly under scrutiny.

Governor Pritzker and Attorney General Raoul are set to address the issue in a news conference at 2 p.m. on Monday, joined by Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson. CBS News Chicago will livestream the event on its 24/7 news stream and on air. As this story unfolds, it’s clear that the outcome will have far-reaching implications for civil liberties, federal-state relations, and the very fabric of American democracy.

Controversy & Comment Hooks: Is the deployment of the National Guard a legitimate tool for maintaining order, or does it cross the line into federal overreach? Do you agree with the lawsuit’s claim that such actions threaten local autonomy and civil liberties? Share your thoughts in the comments—this is a debate that demands diverse perspectives.

For more details, visit the following links:
- Lawsuit (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/tag/lawsuit/)
- Chicago (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/tag/chicago/)
- Illinois (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/tag/illinois/)
- Trump Administration (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/tag/trump-administration/)
- National Guard of the United States (https://www.cbsnews.com/chicago/tag/national-guard-of-the-united-states/)

Reporting by Sara Tenenbaum, Senior Digital Producer for CBS News Chicago, who covers breaking, local, and community news in Chicago. Previously, she worked as a digital producer and senior digital producer for ABC7 Chicago.

Illinois and Chicago Sue Trump Over National Guard Deployment: Unconstitutional or Necessary? (2025)

References

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Recommended Articles
Article information

Author: Jamar Nader

Last Updated:

Views: 5691

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (75 voted)

Reviews: 82% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Jamar Nader

Birthday: 1995-02-28

Address: Apt. 536 6162 Reichel Greens, Port Zackaryside, CT 22682-9804

Phone: +9958384818317

Job: IT Representative

Hobby: Scrapbooking, Hiking, Hunting, Kite flying, Blacksmithing, Video gaming, Foraging

Introduction: My name is Jamar Nader, I am a fine, shiny, colorful, bright, nice, perfect, curious person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.